header banner
POLITICS, Republica Watch, Latest Updates

Govt intervention in state-run media is not new

KATHMANDU, April 28: A debate is raging on social media platforms about the role of state-funded media after Radio Nepal removed an interview with former Prime Minister Dr Baburam Bhattarai from its online archive.
Infographics: Kamal Subedi/ Republica
By Republica

KATHMANDU, April 28: A debate is raging on social media platforms about the role of state-funded media after Radio Nepal removed an interview with former Prime Minister Dr Baburam Bhattarai from its online archive. 


Opinions are sharply divided in social media over the limitations of the state-run media. Some say these media can't produce contents that are critical of the government and the ruling party while others argue the state-owned media should become the voice of the ordinary people not the mouthpiece of the ruling party or the government. 


However, Dr Bhattarai's interview is just case in point. There are several similar instances in the recent past, where the governments have been accused of taking a harsher approach to the state-run media for running anti-government programs/contents. 


Related story

Why media must be free


Dr Bhattarai, who is an opposition party leader, has now come heavily upon the Oli government for controlling Radio Nepal politically. But evidence suggests that Dr Bhattarai also did the same when he was at the helm of the government back in January 2013. 


Taking a strong exception to the views expressed by Nepali Congress leader Manmohan Bhattarai during a live interview program called "Antarsambad" aired by Radio Nepal on January 13, 2013, Prime Minister Bhattarai had instructed Information Minister Raj Kishor Yadav to take action against Suresh Kumar Karki, the executive director of Radio Nepal and program host Pramod Dahal.


In his interview, the Nepali Congress leader had accused the then Prime Minister Bhattarai of becoming an agent of India. "Bhattarai is an agent of Hindustan (India) and Hindustan also says that it was she who helped him become the prime minister of Nepal, and Prime Minister Bhattarai also feels proud of it. This is very disheartening," NC leader Bhattarai had said during the interview. 


The two incidents have some commonalities. In both, the Prime Ministers (Bhattarai and Oli) disagreed with the views expressed by the opposition party leaders critical of the government. 


With the advent of the Oli-led government in February 2018, his administration seems to be more intolerant to media freedom in general. It was on June 14, 2018, the then government spokesperson Gokul Baskota ordered the NTV administration to shut down a talk show called "Sidha Prashna" after the host of the program, Raju Thapa, grilled Baskota about his property details. 


Successive governments in Nepal have faced criticism for controlling the state-run media.  Available evidence suggests that the government, in one way or the other, controls the state-owned media, and turns them into a mouthpiece of the ruling parties or the government. 


The state-owned media have repeatedly become the victim of dirty politics. As a result, they simply broadcast or print what the ruling parties feel good about. There has been a sort of self-censorship in terms of releasing the content through the state-run media relating to the ruling party or the government. 

Related Stories
POLITICS

'Intervention not acceptable'

ECONOMY

Workers seek govt intervention in lay-offs and pay...

Interview

‘Media is not just a business, but also a public s...

SOCIETY

Bill on Nepal Media: New law seeks up to Rs 10m fi...

SOCIETY

KMG Chairman Sirohiya alleges strategic interventi...