The term Māsinya finds its roots in the 1854 Muluki Ain (National Code) promulgated by the state of Nepal during the Rana regime.
Among Nepal's many ethnic communities, the Tamang are known for their rich culture, language, and traditions. Yet, their history is deeply intertwined with systemic oppression and marginalization. The term "Māsinya" exemplifies this narrative of suppression, serving as a derogatory label enforced through Nepal's caste-based social hierarchy. Introduced as part of the state’s codified discrimination under the 1854 Muluki Ain, "Māsinya" was wielded as a tool to suppress the Tamang, stripping them of autonomy and relegating them to an inferior status.
Understanding the historical and social implications of Māsinya is crucial to comprehending the structural challenges that the Tamang have endured, as well as their enduring fight for dignity, identity, and equality.
The term Māsinya finds its roots in the 1854 Muluki Ain (National Code) promulgated by the state of Nepal during the Rana regime. This legal document codified a rigid caste hierarchy that sought to control and categorize Nepal's diverse population. Under this system, the Tamang were forcibly placed into the "Māsinya" category, which was synonymous with subjugation and inferiority. The label reduced them to a status of servitude, branding them as "enslavable alcohol drinkers" (“Bhote”), a term rife with prejudice and intended to strip them of their cultural and social identity.
This classification was not merely symbolic; it had tangible repercussions. The Tamang were denied access to education, land ownership, and positions of authority. They were relegated to menial labor and servitude, often exploited by the state and the dominant castes. The term Māsinya became a tool of systemic oppression, ensuring that the Tamang remained at the margins of society.
The Tamang people are widely recognized for their bravery, kindness, and innocence, traits that have defined their community over centuries. Historically, they inhabited the hills surrounding Kathmandu Valley, an area of significant strategic importance. This proximity to power centers made the state wary of their potential influence and strength, leading to deliberate marginalization. Despite such challenges, the Tamang have retained their core values and contributed immensely to Nepal’s social and cultural landscape, demonstrating resilience in the face of adversity.
Cultural Suppression and Social Exclusion
The imposition of Māsinya had a profound impact on the Tamang community's cultural and social fabric. Their language, customs, and religious practices were devalued and dismissed as inferior. Almost a century after the promulgation of the Muluki Ain under Prime Minister Jung Bahadur Rana, Tamang people were officially allowed to write "Tamang" as their caste in legal documents, marking a crucial step in reclaiming their identity despite systemic oppression.
Voter Suppression Comes to Europe
Social exclusion was another devastating consequence. The caste hierarchy dictated social interactions, marriages, and community participation, often isolating the Tamang from the broader Nepali society. This exclusion reinforced a cycle of poverty and disenfranchisement, making it nearly impossible for the Tamang to break free from their marginalized status.
The Economic Ramifications of Māsinya
The economic impacts of the Māsinya classification were equally significant. Denied access to fertile land and economic opportunities, many Tamang were forced to work as bonded laborers in agriculture, construction, and domestic service. This economic disenfranchisement further entrenched their position at the bottom of the social hierarchy, limiting their ability to invest in education or business ventures. Entire generations of Tamang were trapped in a cycle of poverty, their economic prospects curtailed by the systemic barriers imposed through caste discrimination.
Additionally, the lack of representation in political and administrative structures ensured that the Tamang had little say in policies affecting their livelihoods. This absence of agency perpetuated their marginalization, as the dominant groups used their influence to maintain control over resources and opportunities.
Legal Reforms and Persistent Discrimination
Nepal officially abolished the legal recognition of the caste system in 1963 with the introduction of a new legal code that aimed to eliminate caste-based discrimination. Subsequent legal frameworks, including the Constitution of Nepal 2015, have reinforced these principles. Article 24 (1) of the Constitution explicitly prohibits any form of untouchability or discrimination in both private and public spheres based on origin, caste, tribe, community, profession, occupation, or physical condition.
Despite these legal provisions, caste-based discrimination remains deeply entrenched in Nepali society. Social attitudes and prejudices, ingrained over centuries, continue to manifest in various forms of exclusion and marginalization. Incidents of caste-based discrimination are reported across the country, indicating that legal reforms, while necessary, are insufficient to eradicate deeply rooted societal biases.
Prime Minister's Acknowledgment
On December 18, 2024, Prime Minister KP Sharma Oli addressed the persistent issue of caste[1]based discrimination in Nepal. Speaking at the 37th anniversary of the Nepal Oppressed Ethnic Liberation Society, he emphasized the fundamental equality of all humans, stating, "First and foremost, we are all human." He acknowledged that caste-based prejudices have deeply pierced society, likening them to thorns that need to be uprooted entirely.
The prime minister’s statement resonates with the reality that caste discrimination is a human[1]made construct designed to oppress certain groups. His acknowledgment opens a dialogue about the contributions of the Tamang community, which despite facing centuries of marginalization, has left an indelible mark on Nepal’s progress and cultural identity.
Among the contemporary achievements of the Tamang is the monumental work of Kul Man Ghising, the Managing Director of Nepal Electricity Authority. His leadership eradicated load[1]shedding in Nepal, transforming a nation previously enduring up to 18 hours of daily power cuts into one with 24-hour electricity access. This achievement directly impacted millions of lives, showcasing the potential and determination of marginalized communities when given opportunities.
The contributions of the Tamang to Nepalese culture are equally significant. Tamang Selo, the traditional dance and song of the Tamang community, has become a hallmark of Nepalese cultural identity on international stages. Iconic Tamang artists, such as veteran singer Gopal Yonjan, have further elevated Nepal’s profile through music, earning global recognition and admiration.
These examples underscore the Prime Minister’s point that caste distinctions are artificial. They also highlight the irony of celebrating the achievements of individuals from marginalized communities without addressing the systemic inequities that continue to affect their broader community.
International Precedents of Apology
Globally, several nations have formally apologized to indigenous and marginalized communities for historical injustices. On 13 February 2008, Australia issued a formal apology to the Indigenous peoples for past mistreatment, particularly the Stolen Generations. Similarly, On June 11, 2008, Prime Minister Stephen Harper issued a public apology in front of a joint session of Parliament and representatives of the First Nations, Métis, and Inuit, who appeared in full ceremonial dress. Canada apologized to its Indigenous populations for the government's role in the residential school system, which aimed to assimilate Indigenous children and resulted in significant cultural and personal harm.
These apologies have been accompanied by efforts to address the lasting impacts of historical injustices, including compensation, policy reforms, and initiatives aimed at cultural preservation and reconciliation. These international precedents highlight the importance of state acknowledgment in fostering healing and equity.
A Call for Official Apology and Action
If Prime Minister KP Sharma Oli is genuine in his claim that caste systems are human-made constructs and that "we are all human first," he must take actionable steps to address historical injustices. Recognizing the Tamang’s contributions is important, but it must be accompanied by a formal apology for the state’s role in perpetuating systemic discrimination.
Issuing an apology while in office—and not merely as a political stunt—would demonstrate sincerity and a commitment to justice. Such an apology should be accompanied by concrete actions, including the implementation of affirmative action policies, education reforms, and efforts to preserve and promote the unique cultures of Nepal’s diverse communities. It would also require developing platforms where marginalized groups like the Tamang could participate actively in governance and decision-making processes.
Conclusion
Māsinya stands as a stark reminder of the injustices perpetrated against the Tamang community. However, it is also a testament to their resilience and determination to overcome centuries of oppression. By confronting this history and working towards a more inclusive future, Nepal has the opportunity to honor the diversity that defines its identity. In rejecting the derogatory legacy of Māsinya, the Tamang are reclaiming their dignity and asserting their rightful place in the nation’s cultural and social landscape.
The journey from marginalization to empowerment is not an easy one, but the Tamang’s unwavering spirit and collective efforts offer a beacon of hope. Their story serves as a reminder of the importance of acknowledging historical wrongs, fostering inclusivity, and celebrating the contributions of all communities in building a just and equitable society. A formal apology coupled with actionable reforms can set Nepal on a path toward true equality, ensuring that the wounds of the past are healed and never repeated.
