header banner

Off target

alt=
By No Author
Last week, Ministry of Commerce and Supplies (MoCS) strongly pushed a proposal seeking exemption of value added tax (VAT) on liquefied petroleum gas (LPG) as an option to reverse the recent price rise of the fuel in urban areas. It even requested the two powerful committees – Finance and Labor Relations Committee and Public Accounts Committee – of the parliament to issue instruction to the Ministry of Finance to this regard. We believe the proposal is shortsighted and will do nothing other than harm the overall economy. LPG no doubt generated loss of well over Rs 1 billion and is still inflicting loss of some Rs 250 million a month to Nepal Oil Corporation (NOC). But exempting VAT on the fuel is not the solution.



MoCS has argued LPG has already become an essential commodity and is also widely consumed by poor rural people. But its own data suggest, monthly gas consumption hovers around a million cylinders and some 45 percent of its consumers are hotels, restaurants, factories, automobiles and other commercial ventures. As such, only around 20 percent Nepalis rely on LPG to cook foods. And we all know where this population lives. But what is true is that LPG’s demand is growing rapidly. Why will it not? Today a family needs to spend Rs 68.50 for a liter of kerosene and Rs 72 on wood (to get energy yield equivalent to kerosene). On the other hand, MoCS has continued to keep LPG priced at Rs 50 per liter. Such pricing is giving boost to its consumption. This is a serious policy anomaly. Exempting VAT, on top of it, will only expand this anomaly.



Hence, instead of seeking VAT exemption on gas, we urge the MoCS to focus more on making consumers attuned to paying what it costs for the product. No consumer demands price cut on rice or lentil or edible oil even though these are much more essential than the type of fuel they use to cook them. Why? MoCS must understand this and political leaders at the helm of the ministry should stop politicizing the issue.



MoCS must repeatedly inform the public how the international oil prices are moving and put in place automatic pricing. This may take time. But it can instantly enforce differential pricing for commercial consumers. This will immediately cut its cost. Secondly, it must review the cost it is covering for the private bottlers. There must after all be a reason as to why the number of LPG bottlers almost tripled to over 50 during the last two years even as NOC suffered huge losses. MoCS must also force NOC to reform. The state-owned petroleum monopolist is infamous for corruption and leakage.



Studies conducted over the past 15 years have said NOC can reduce its cost through restructuring and reforming its operations. MoCS must shift its focus toward that.



Related story

Raising Internal Debt to Meet Revenue Target can be Counterprod...

Related Stories
ECONOMY

Nepalgunj Customs collects only 52% of revenue tar...

banke-1774143185.webp
ECONOMY

Birgunj Revenue Office exceeds target, collects ov...

1658890025_birgunjnaka-1200x560_20240926124033.jpg
ECONOMY

NRB likely to miss target of private sector lendin...

NRB.jpg
ECONOMY

Biratnagar Customs Office achieves its monthly rev...

ztqkfKV5V3U0wsXlDqCbmG4Ak4OQyNWWyX2iIdAw.jpg
SPORTS

NPL: Gurkhas get reachable target of 118 runs

TRh8mHUM60VnYxM0lVelBQWT5CHTfL21ImDmDTaJ.jpg