header banner
OPINION

No safe zones for women

Chronic anxiety of sexual harassment in public transport narrows down socio-economic prospects of women
By Biranchi Poudyal/ Samikshya Thapa

Chronic anxiety of sexual harassment in public transport narrows down socio-economic prospects of women


Sexual harassment on public transport remains a daily experience for millions of women residing in the cities. Harassment has become the matter of social debate but the bigger picture has not yet got proper attention in the discussion forum. When it comes to sexual harassment in public transportation, the issue of female sexual right, psychological trauma and women empowerment dominate the discourse.  Such harassment experience not only makes women traumatic but also has a long-term effect on women’s access to socioeconomic opportunity and their mobility pattern. During our research in Kathmandu valley, we found many women who chose to abandon handsome paying evening shift jobs just because of safety concern in public vehicles. In this regard, a constant threat of harassment actually influences women’s potential to move freely in public and also impacts their decision to involve in the labor market or the kinds of career opportunities they pursue. 


According to Global Mobility Report released in December 2017 “the lack of personal security, or the inability to use public transport without the fear of being victimized―whether on public transport, walking to or from a transit facility or stop, or waiting at a bus, transit stop, or station platform―can substantially decrease the attractiveness and thus the use of public transit.”  Freedom of physical movement is essential in the growth of every individual’s social and economic horizon but the possible chronic anxiety of sexual harassment in transport can lead to disconnection with public spheres and narrow down the socio-economic prospect for many women.


Limiting potentials  


Related story

Making SEZs successful


In practical ground such mobility barrier limits the number of trips women make, resulting in a decline in household income, as unsafe transportation prevents women from accessing their full employment and academic opportunities. There are many families in Kathmandu that don’t allow female counterparts to take up outer economic employment due to lack of safe travel options. And even while choosing a college for their daughters some parents inside the valley give topmost priority to viable transportation over quality education. Ensuring safe transport mobility would open up better access to quality education and career opportunity for thousands of girls. 


Moreover, vehicle insecurity is indirectly fostering traffic problem, as more privileged women who hesitate to use public vehicle turn to private vehicles, adding more density in already congested roads of Kathmandu. 


When we see crowded public transport we may not directly link it with a gender perspective. But male and female’s experiences with public vehicle differ critically in regard to physical safety and security.  Most public vehicles in Kathmandu comprise spaces like front-facing seats narrow passages where women remain vulnerable to sexual assaults. Ask any male about his topmost priority in public vehicle. Most likely he will answer ‘speed or comfort’. Ask the same question to any female and the answer will probably be ‘safety’. “My parents didn’t let me enroll in the college I chose because they didn’t have college bus. In public bus girls like me remain vulnerable to sexual assault,” said one of the college students from Kathmandu.  


It sometimes seems like crowded public vehicles allow ill-intentioned males both anonymity and opportunity to involve in sexual abuse with minimum risk of legal or social penalties. The research entitled “Sexual Harassment in Public Vehicle of Kathmandu” conducted by our organization has found that despite the seriousness of such sexual assaults very few women report the case—statistically less than two out of ten. Women tend not to report the majority of such occurrences fearing that they will be accused of being over-reactive or not taken seriously. 


Prevention measure


To respond to this problem, Kathmandu has experimented with “women only bus service” that literally puts women in a safe zone beyond physical reach of the potential assaulter. This is only immediate intervention to the problem. It doesn’t change the attitude of the assaulter. Solutions need to be sustainable. Proper utilization of technology could help. Today, we all have multi-functional phones in our pockets. We can click picture or record video of a harasser. Additionally empowering women to respond to harassment and giving them defensive training is essential. 


Analyzing Nepal’s transport situation, as required by modern mobility paradigms and whole travel experiences, the increasing evidence of sexual assault in a vehicle can be seen as a policy failure and non-inclusive transport system.  Our future transport management framework needs to consider multidimensional aspects of mobility and the factors influencing or restricting women’s travel choices. While designing transportation structures, the gender-specific study should be carried out. Transport policy must include gender indicators before allotting public vehicles. Good design of public vehicles could play a role in creating safe space for women and minimize probable circumstances of sexual assaults.  


Poudyal and Thapa are researchers at Global Initiative for Vivid Empowerment, a 

Kathmandu based NGO

Related Stories
SOCIETY

Bajura sees growth in access to safe abortion serv...

POLITICS

Prohibited zones declared around Sahid Chowk and G...

ECONOMY

EIA of two industrial zones initiated

POLITICS

Govt designates no-strike zones in 25 areas

SOCIETY

Three local units in Mustang call for removal of t...