header banner
OPINION

The Leadership Labyrinth

Picture this: a young business leader, coffee cup in hand, passionately sharing an inspiring TED talk with their team. They’re enthusiastic, they’re motivational, but the company feels like a ship without a compass–lacking vision, direction, and the winds of collective purpose.
By Fr. Augustine Thomas, S.J.

Picture this: a young business leader, coffee cup in hand, passionately sharing an inspiring TED talk with their team. They’re enthusiastic, they’re motivational, but the company feels like a ship without a compass–lacking vision, direction, and the winds of collective purpose. Then there’s another leader, armed with a flawless PowerPoint strategy, unaware that it’s a complete misfit for their organization. And then there’s the sticky-note enthusiast. Sticky notes with motivational quotes like “Hard work pays off” or “Dream Big” are plastered all over employees’ desks. The leader hopes these visual reminders will ignite a spark. Yet, the team remains uninspired, the workplace buzzing with tasks but devoid of shared drive. These scenarios show common struggles in leadership: a disconnect between good intentions and effective execution.


But what separates the leaders who struggle from those who thrive? Some answers can be found within Nepal’s corporate landscape. Many industrial leaders, particularly those inheriting family businesses, have drawn upon traditional mentorship. Their parents and predecessors served as guides, helping them shape their leadership style while adapting age-old wisdom to contemporary challenges.


Meanwhile, young leaders armed with academic credentials and polished theories often find the real world isn’t as forgiving as the lecture halls. Their journey is one of trial and error, where the leap from theory to application often exposes glaring gaps. Here are some areas where aspiring leaders can falter and how these gaps can be addressed.


The Disconnect from Context


A son returns home after earning a PhD in mathematics, bursting with knowledge and confidence. He notices two apples on the dining table but insists there are three–he has applied an abstract concept from his studies. After a frustrating argument, his parents pick up an apple each and say, “You can have the third.”


Theories and ideologies, while valuable, may not always translate into real-world solutions. Practical leadership requires grounding strategies in the realities of the situation at hand. With degrees and theoretical knowledge, many young leaders initially feel they have all the answers. However, the real world often demands an understanding of the context that goes beyond textbooks. The workplace is no theoretical sandbox. A leader must tailor strategies to fit the specific circumstances of their environment.


A 2016 study published in the Journal of Politics points this out. It revealed that college-educated leaders often perform no better–and sometimes worse–than their less-educated counterparts. This evidence shows that theoretical knowledge is of limited value if not applied effectively. The message is clear: leadership success hinges on situational awareness and contextual adaptability. Leaders who adapt their strategies based on cultural and situational contexts are more effective in achieving organizational goals than those who rigidly adhere to textbook strategies.


Strategies Beyond Human Relationships


Related story

Great Leadership: A Road Less Traveled


Imagine a leader so consumed by perfecting their plans and hitting targets that they forget the people driving those numbers. Their strategies are airtight, their goals ambitious, but their team feels like cogs in a machine–dispensable, undervalued, and uninspired. This is a trap many leaders fall into: prioritizing metrics over human relationships.


Leadership isn’t just about moving chess pieces; it’s about understanding that the chessboard is made up of humans with emotions, aspirations, and the need for connection. Studies, such as one from the Australian Journal of Basic and Applied Sciences, show that trust and cohesion within teams boost satisfaction and effectiveness. Take Satya Nadella, Microsoft’s CEO, for example. Nadella didn’t just focus on innovation; he transformed Microsoft’s culture by emphasizing empathy, trust, and open communication. His leadership led to a reinvigorated workforce and a company resurgence.


The lesson? Leadership isn’t just about balancing charts and goals, it’s about empathy, collaboration, and practicing a sense of shared purpose.


Getting Carried Away by Jargon


We’ve all seen it: the leader who speaks in a flurry of buzzwords, sprinkling terms like synergy, leverage, or disruptive innovation into every conversation. At first, it might sound impressive, but soon it becomes clear–there’s more fluff than substance.


Misusing jargon can alienate team members, create confusion, and stall progress. However, when used wisely, it can clarify vision and action. Well-placed jargon, theories, or strategies can be like riding a well-crafted wheel–building on what has already been discovered and proven effective.


A 2014 study in the American Journal of Industrial and Business Management revealed how poor jargon can confuse employees, create communication barriers, and negatively affect morale, productivity, and organizational success. The key? Purposeful use of language. A leader who throws around terms like blockchain integration without understanding its implications may lose credibility. However, a leader who explains blockchain as a tool for transparency in supply chains not only educates but inspires trust.


Language is a tool–it should be used to build bridges, not barriers.


Disorganized and Disconnected Mindset


In Nepal, like other countries, one of the key cultural and organizational challenges, even for emerging leaders, stems from a disorganized and disconnected mindset. This is often rooted in the way flexibility is prioritized over structure in everyday practices, especially in professional and educational settings.


Consider this scenario: a workshop is scheduled for 10 a.m., but participants trickle in by 10:45, and the session starts an hour late. This lack of punctuality might be dismissed as a minor inconvenience, but it reveals a larger, systemic problem–a disregard for structure and time. This mindset, if left unaddressed, can permeate an organization, weakening its operations, strategies, and overall effectiveness.


For aspiring leaders, effective leadership demands more than just inspiring others. It requires strategic planning, systemic thinking, and an acute attention to detail–qualities that must be deliberately cultivated. Leadership is about transforming ideas, decisions, and actions into tangible outcomes and organizational goals. However, this critical skill set is frequently overlooked or underdeveloped in many emerging leaders.


A Blurred Vision Leading to Micromanagement


A traveler lost in the hills asks a villager, “Is this the road to Marcello?” The villager replies, “Yes, sir, this is the road to Marcello–but you're heading in the wrong direction.” The lesson is simple: knowing your destination or the path isn’t enough; you must also move in the right direction. This analogy holds true for young leaders navigating their organizational journeys.


The greatest strength of young leaders lies in their passion, energy, and innovative ideas. However, without a clear vision to guide them, this energy can become scattered, leaving them all over the place. Many young leaders face the dual challenge of carving out a clear vision for their organization while striving to prove their competence and effectiveness. When vision is blurred–marked by vague or poorly defined goals articulating what, where, when, and how–it creates confusion and misalignment within the team. Team members may feel adrift and unsure of how their contributions align with the bigger picture. Over time, this lack of clarity erodes motivation and trust.


In such situations, young leaders often resort to micromanagement, not out of preference but as a response to their own insecurity, lack of trust, and need to maintain control. Micromanagement, however, stifles creativity, discourages initiative, and diminishes team morale, further compounding the leadership challenge.


Leadership Redefined


Leadership is not a one-size-fits-all formula; it’s a dynamic interplay of vision, context, relationships, and communication. The pitfalls of a disorganized mindset, blurred vision, overreliance on jargon, or neglect of human connections are not insurmountable challenges. They are opportunities to reflect, adapt, and grow.


Great leaders don’t just inspire–they align passion with purpose, strategy with empathy, and theory with practice. They recognize that leadership is less about commanding and more about connecting: connecting ideas to actions, goals to reality, and people to a shared sense of purpose.


In the ever-changing labyrinth of leadership, the compass isn’t perfection–it’s progress, guided by clarity, humility, and the courage to embrace the lessons along the way.


 

Related Stories
OPINION

Political Leadership Vs Organizational Leadership

OPINION

Untapped leadership

My City

Leadership above management

OPINION

Navigating the Legal Labyrinth: The Imperative Evo...

My City

Taste of freedom