header banner

Transparency and accountability in INGOS in Nepal

alt=
By No Author
surajthapa1@hotmail.com

Transparency and accountability in INGOS in Nepal.



 


The beauty of INGOS lies in their objectives of the delivery of services to the unreached people and community in a cost effective manner.  Our main concern is whether the funds spent through INGOS   are used for the right purpose, right place and right people. Monitoring   the INGOS on financial grounds like bank accounts is just one step of the audit. The bigger test is effective measurement   of the delivery of the INGOS to the target group - local community and the local people- . Even if  the financial papers are correct  if there is no effective and proper use of the fund  leading  to  inefficient  delivery to the  target group  the bank account monitoring  alone  will not serve the purpose of gauging accountability .


According to the data provided by  Social Welfare Council (SWC)  there are 211 INGOS  as of the year 2071-2072  Bikram Sambat where they have been  serving  in the fields like  health, drinking water, sanitation, energy, disaster management  training, agriculture, environment, education, and livelihood programs among  others.


The  article  published in  Republica "SWC, ministries fail to rein in erring organizations" written by SANTOSH GHIMIRE/ PUSPA RAJ ACHARAYA  dated 27th April 2014  states that "only 14 out of 173 International non-governmental organizations (INGOs) working in Nepal have reported out their project and expenditure details to the government so far." Thus it is seen that there is a need to instill transparency and accountability in INGOS operating in Nepal.


 


  Social Welfare Council'S  (SWC'S)  new measure where  financial  transaction  of INGOS would be brought   under government  banking system (NRB) , SWC'S  directive for  INGOS to  open bank accounts is  a positive  step which will no doubt  aid in  bringing transparency  in the financial aspect in  INGOS.  But is just monitoring financial transparency through   bank accounts of INGOS enough?  It is one of the step of many steps that government should initiate to bring transparency. This step will help in reduction of    money laundering   and foreign   currency misuse. The SWC  should  conduct  propriety   and  management  audit   on a yearly basis   which would give an idea of where  particular  INGO  is  heading  and also  indicate   sources and uses of fund . The step taken by SWC  is a good step  but  one wonder's   why  SWC  for so many years kept quiet and has  suddenly introduced  this  control mechanism ?  Is it that the SWC saw a lot of fund coming through INGOS after the earthquake and suddenly decided to monitor the source and use of funds?


 


Nearly one-sixth of all the foreign assistance that comes to Nepal is received through international non-governmental organizations (INGOs), a government report said .Development Cooperation Report 2013-14, which was released by the Finance Ministry states that 16.7 percent of the aid Nepal received during the year was routed through INGOs. Out of the total aid of $1.24 billion provided to Nepal in the last fiscal, $208 million (around Rs 20 billion) was funneled through INGOs. This data shows that a large portion of development expenditure is managed by INGOS.  Many INOGS  have done a  good job in delivering  valuable services to the unreached  people and community , in some cases , better than the government .But have all the INGOS  used the  large amount  of money  properly  or spent  most of it  on consultants and management fees ? And the government, which gets the lion share, around 83.3 percent of foreign aid, should also be monitored for effective delivery.


Effectiveness of the INGOS in "reaching to the unreached"


 Government should make plans to both allocate the sectors of work  and geographically disperse the working of   INGOS.    Due diligence must be conducted before new INGOS are allowed to  operate  to ensure    that they are dispersed  geographically  and also work in such  fields  like education , health , Reproductive health,  sanitation among others  which need   the most help. Many  INGOS'S head office and offices are  in Kathmandu .  If the main offices or more  branch  offices  were located  in    - far  Western ,  far Eastern  , remote hills , remote  mountains  and unreached Terai  or  even in cities other than Kathmandu  , then these areas would see more  development as many service delivery and  economic activities would take place  there .  


   The government's  belated decision of introducing   transparency  measures reveal s  SWC lack of oversight over INGOS  and indicates that   it doesn't  monitor their functioning in a planned  manner and adopts adhoc measures on a trial and error basis.


Related story

NRA's instruction to NGO/INGO to maintain transparency


INGOS    like any  organization run on trust  and  honest work of employees and on relationship and warmth between concerned  people especially  between INGOS   and   local people and community . The main   concern is proper functioning of INGOS and  reliable delivery of services and work to the community , which can only happen through good governance and good management .A corrupt management   can manipulate the  financial  statements in the banks  in its favor    and make it  appear transparent  . An organization's biggest asset and  weakness is its employees. So financial  audit must be accompanied by management  audit  also .


 NGOS  and INGOS in themselves are a good  vehicle  of providing service at a low cost .  A lot of them have done good job of reaching to the poor .For  effective monitoring, the  government and SWC   itself should   be transparent and non corrupt.     If a manager or a leader  himself/herself  is corrupt  he /she  cannot   control and expect  his/her staff  subordinate staff  not  to be   corrupt .CIAA  cannot  flex its muscles if it is corrupt .A weak  and corrupt government  won't be a good monitor  of INGOS'S transparency and accountability .


 The   excerpt below   is taken from an article by SUBHASH  GHIMIRE   published  in  Republica  on  14 June  2015  "Of  the 3.5  billon dollars in earthquake funds ,96 percent was managed by INGOS in Haiti, with the  Haitian government  managing only one percent. Most of the 96 percent of the funds   was spent on consultations, transportation and on expert opinion .The lack of local governments to oversee INGO work only fueled the corruption . Haiti is popularly known today as the ' republic of INGOS'. We donot want to see a replay  of the same story  in Nepal . New York-based ProPublica's recent exposé of the 'gross mismanagement of half a billion dollars' by  the International Red Cross in the aftermath of the 2010 earthquake in Haiti provides useful insight into the workings of many international organizations in the developing world. They built just six houses and never trusted local wisdom and expertise in Carribean country's rebuilding efforts. Unlike Haiti  where vast epidemic  affected the  people and only six houses were made after the earthquake   ,Nepalese showed resilience, community feeling, compassion ,brotherhood ,sisterhood, and camaraderie and helped each other at the local level after the massive earthquake of April 2015 and May 2015. Local people showed a lot of commitment and  hard work in relief operations.  Many houses,  both temporary and permanent  were built ,large quantities  food was distributed   and  much medical help  was given.  Many people got involved  in relief and rehab operations .Out of the many touching incidents ,  a poignant  moment  came when a young school girl  took out money from her khutruke  ( small Saving pot) and gave money to help the victims.


 This shows that Nepalese  are resilient and rise to the occasion to cope up with calamities . Hence if INGOS  were honest and only used the money they got wisely, they would get a lot of support  from their targeted group. INGOS  with the help of the local community  could make a big  impact on the effective delivery to the poor .


 Even  with flush of funds   and networking INGOS will b  ineffective  if  they  cannot deliver. So, SWC  should play a proactive role in  ensuring  effective delivery  through INGOS. The step taken by SWC  for transparency  is a positive one, it should also scrutinize audit reports to know sources and uses of funds more closely .More geographical dispersal of INGOS  should be made  and due diligence must be done before new INGOS are allowed to operate  to avoid duplication and ensure delivery effectiveness.


As they say a journey of a thousand miles begins with the first step ,similarly  the journey  for transparency and accountability of INGOS,  although   belated has begun . A corruption free, politically free     SWC  working in the national interest will be a good monitor for transparency test  of INGOS and the Nepal  government is urged to work in that direction.


 


 


 


 



Transparency and accountability in INGOS in Nepal.


 


The beauty of INGOS lies in their objectives of the delivery of services to the unreached people and community in a cost effective manner.  Our main concern is whether the funds spent through INGOS   are used for the right purpose, right place and right people. Monitoring   the INGOS on financial grounds like bank accounts is just one step of the audit. The bigger test is effective measurement   of the delivery of the INGOS to the target group - local community and the local people- . Even if  the financial papers are correct  if there is no effective and proper use of the fund  leading  to  inefficient  delivery to the  target group  the bank account monitoring  alone  will not serve the purpose of gauging accountability .


According to the data provided by  Social Welfare Council (SWC)  there are 211 INGOS  as of the year 2071-2072  Bikram Sambat where they have been  serving  in the fields like  health, drinking water, sanitation, energy, disaster management  training, agriculture, environment, education, and livelihood programs among  others.


The  article  published in  Republica "SWC, ministries fail to rein in erring organizations" written by SANTOSH GHIMIRE/ PUSPA RAJ ACHARAYA  dated 27th April 2014  states that "only 14 out of 173 International non-governmental organizations (INGOs) working in Nepal have reported out their project and expenditure details to the government so far." Thus it is seen that there is a need to instill transparency and accountability in INGOS operating in Nepal.


 


  Social Welfare Council'S  (SWC'S)  new measure where  financial  transaction  of INGOS would be brought   under government  banking system (NRB) , SWC'S  directive for  INGOS to  open bank accounts is  a positive  step which will no doubt  aid in  bringing transparency  in the financial aspect in  INGOS.  But is just monitoring financial transparency through   bank accounts of INGOS enough?  It is one of the step of many steps that government should initiate to bring transparency. This step will help in reduction of    money laundering   and foreign   currency misuse. The SWC  should  conduct  propriety   and  management  audit   on a yearly basis   which would give an idea of where  particular  INGO  is  heading  and also  indicate   sources and uses of fund . The step taken by SWC  is a good step  but  one wonder's   why  SWC  for so many years kept quiet and has  suddenly introduced  this  control mechanism ?  Is it that the SWC saw a lot of fund coming through INGOS after the earthquake and suddenly decided to monitor the source and use of funds?


 


Nearly one-sixth of all the foreign assistance that comes to Nepal is received through international non-governmental organizations (INGOs), a government report said .Development Cooperation Report 2013-14, which was released by the Finance Ministry states that 16.7 percent of the aid Nepal received during the year was routed through INGOs. Out of the total aid of $1.24 billion provided to Nepal in the last fiscal, $208 million (around Rs 20 billion) was funneled through INGOs. This data shows that a large portion of development expenditure is managed by INGOS.  Many INOGS  have done a  good job in delivering  valuable services to the unreached  people and community , in some cases , better than the government .But have all the INGOS  used the  large amount  of money  properly  or spent  most of it  on consultants and management fees ? And the government, which gets the lion share, around 83.3 percent of foreign aid, should also be monitored for effective delivery.


Effectiveness of the INGOS in "reaching to the unreached"


 Government should make plans to both allocate the sectors of work  and geographically disperse the working of   INGOS.    Due diligence must be conducted before new INGOS are allowed to  operate  to ensure    that they are dispersed  geographically  and also work in such  fields  like education , health , Reproductive health,  sanitation among others  which need   the most help. Many  INGOS'S head office and offices are  in Kathmandu .  If the main offices or more  branch  offices  were located  in    - far  Western ,  far Eastern  , remote hills , remote  mountains  and unreached Terai  or  even in cities other than Kathmandu  , then these areas would see more  development as many service delivery and  economic activities would take place  there .  


   The government's  belated decision of introducing   transparency  measures reveal s  SWC lack of oversight over INGOS  and indicates that   it doesn't  monitor their functioning in a planned  manner and adopts adhoc measures on a trial and error basis.


INGOS    like any  organization run on trust  and  honest work of employees and on relationship and warmth between concerned  people especially  between INGOS   and   local people and community . The main   concern is proper functioning of INGOS and  reliable delivery of services and work to the community , which can only happen through good governance and good management .A corrupt management   can manipulate the  financial  statements in the banks  in its favor    and make it  appear transparent  . An organization's biggest asset and  weakness is its employees. So financial  audit must be accompanied by management  audit  also .


 NGOS  and INGOS in themselves are a good  vehicle  of providing service at a low cost .  A lot of them have done good job of reaching to the poor .For  effective monitoring, the  government and SWC   itself should   be transparent and non corrupt.     If a manager or a leader  himself/herself  is corrupt  he /she  cannot   control and expect  his/her staff  subordinate staff  not  to be   corrupt .CIAA  cannot  flex its muscles if it is corrupt .A weak  and corrupt government  won't be a good monitor  of INGOS'S transparency and accountability .


 The   excerpt below   is taken from an article by SUBHASH  GHIMIRE   published  in  Republica  on  14 June  2015  "Of  the 3.5  billon dollars in earthquake funds ,96 percent was managed by INGOS in Haiti, with the  Haitian government  managing only one percent. Most of the 96 percent of the funds   was spent on consultations, transportation and on expert opinion .The lack of local governments to oversee INGO work only fueled the corruption . Haiti is popularly known today as the ' republic of INGOS'. We donot want to see a replay  of the same story  in Nepal . New York-based ProPublica's recent exposé of the 'gross mismanagement of half a billion dollars' by  the International Red Cross in the aftermath of the 2010 earthquake in Haiti provides useful insight into the workings of many international organizations in the developing world. They built just six houses and never trusted local wisdom and expertise in Carribean country's rebuilding efforts. Unlike Haiti  where vast epidemic  affected the  people and only six houses were made after the earthquake   ,Nepalese showed resilience, community feeling, compassion ,brotherhood ,sisterhood, and camaraderie and helped each other at the local level after the massive earthquake of April 2015 and May 2015. Local people showed a lot of commitment and  hard work in relief operations.  Many houses,  both temporary and permanent  were built ,large quantities  food was distributed   and  much medical help  was given.  Many people got involved  in relief and rehab operations .Out of the many touching incidents ,  a poignant  moment  came when a young school girl  took out money from her khutruke  ( small Saving pot) and gave money to help the victims.


 This shows that Nepalese  are resilient and rise to the occasion to cope up with calamities . Hence if INGOS  were honest and only used the money they got wisely, they would get a lot of support  from their targeted group. INGOS  with the help of the local community  could make a big  impact on the effective delivery to the poor .


 Even  with flush of funds   and networking INGOS will b  ineffective  if  they  cannot deliver. So, SWC  should play a proactive role in  ensuring  effective delivery  through INGOS. The step taken by SWC  for transparency  is a positive one, it should also scrutinize audit reports to know sources and uses of funds more closely .More geographical dispersal of INGOS  should be made  and due diligence must be done before new INGOS are allowed to operate  to avoid duplication and ensure delivery effectiveness.


As they say a journey of a thousand miles begins with the first step ,similarly  the journey  for transparency and accountability of INGOS,  although   belated has begun . A corruption free, politically free     SWC  working in the national interest will be a good monitor for transparency test  of INGOS and the Nepal  government is urged to work in that direction.


 


 


 


 


Related Stories
SOCIETY

INGOs spent Rs 23b in 22 tarai districts in a year

NGO-INGO-Tarai-graph.jpg
ECONOMY

IBP Survey ranks Nepal 65th in terms of budget tra...

InternalBudgetPartnership_20200508183444.jpg
ECONOMY

'Lack of integrity, transparency leads to low inte...

'Lack of integrity, transparency leads to low integrity in hydropower sector'
POLITICS

Open government inevitable in all countries: Helle...

ogijune17.jpg
N/A

Transparency and accountability in INGOs in Nepal

Transparency and accountability in INGOs in Nepal