Since a start has to be made somewhere, initially – as mentioned above – vehicles 20 years and older can be removed from the roads. But, going forward, it will serve us well if we improvise our system of determining ‘outdated’ vehicles. It is not necessary that a vehicle that has been on the roads for a certain span, in this case 20 years, is not in running condition. Similarly, a vehicle that is much younger, say five years, might not be in shape to ply on our roads. What we need are fitness centers that would scientifically determine the condition of the vehicles. Until date, we have none. The government is in the process of building one such center in Teku, Kathmandu, but as we move ahead, we will need more across the country.
The government would also do well to encourage owners of ‘small’ outdated public vehicles to opt for ‘bigger’ replacements. Bigger public vehicles can carry many more passengers, thus fewer of them would suffice implying there would be far less traffic congestion. Also, while choosing replacements, the owners can be encouraged to go for environment-friendly vehicles. Last but not the least, the government should not succumb to the pressure of vehicle owners and send such vehicles from one part of the country to another as it did in 1999 when it removed diesel-run Vikram tempos from the valley and placed them in other parts of the country. Such short-sighted measures will ultimately boomerang on the government.
Scrap vendors stage protest against KMC for the second day in a...