header banner

PM's largesse

alt=
By No Author
The Office of the Prime Minister and Council of Ministers has shamefully revoked the recently introduced provision to clip the prime minister´s discretionary powers to dole out financial assistance to individuals and organizations. The revocation of the provision means that the prime minister can now extend as much largesse as he wants. Though Prime Minister Madhav Kumar Nepal was allotted just 3 million rupees in the current fiscal year to spend as generous assistance to the "needy" (something that has never been well-defined but has always meant those with the political and personal connections to the prime minister´s office), he has already spent 30.05 million in such assistance. This is gross misuse of state funds and a disgrace to the institution of the prime minister.



Prime Minister Nepal has tried to defend himself, arguing that former prime ministers were given a free hand to dole out as much money as they wanted. He even got his assistants to prepare a list of how much former prime ministers spent while they were at Baluwatar and passed the list on to the media so that people would not censure him alone. The reality is, none of his predecessors had a free hand and there always was a limit on how much a given prime minister could actually spend. But his predecessors, like him, chose to spend as freely and as limitlessly as they wished. Mr. Prime Minister, the point is, someone has to do things differently, someone has to initiate the change, and someone has to set a precedent. Mahatma Gandhi famously said, "Be the change you want to see." It is sad that you chose to be just one of the same breed when the people are clamoring for a different style of leadership-- for a different character in their leaders.



Prime Minister Nepal should have been thankful to his ministers and senior bureaucrats at the Prime Minister’s Office who took an initiative and cut his discretionary powers to fork out largesse. By doing so they released him from the burden of obliging anyone and everyone who knocked on his door for financial assistance. With the provision in place, he could have explained to people seeking that favor that his hands were tied. And they would not have blamed him since the provision was introduced while he was abroad. Instead, Nepal chastised his ministers for trying to manacle him and took his own initiative to revoke the provision. What a blinkered attitude! How can you be blind as a bat to what is in your own best interest, prime minister?



Related story

Govt tightens state largesse for VIP medical care

Related Stories
N/A

PM denied funds for largesse

PM denied funds for largesse
SOCIETY

Gen Z crowd clash as they push for their own PMs a...

uT9F36wACHnGAZUHHHCENFnA1HWb7rNikcBqzkRp.jpg
OPINION

Quo Vadis?

RAMCHANDRAPAUDEL_PRACHANDA_20230811074536.jpg
POLITICS

SC raises a question over govt’s decision not to p...

baburam_20230926175619.jpg
POLITICS

Former PMs, FMs urge govt to put emphasis on imple...

1694325865_PM-1200x560_20230910131052.jpg