After the Gen Z protest pushed them to the margins of national politics, political parties have begun resorting to ways of regaining lost relevance. The Nepali Congress and the CPN-UML, two major political forces, are considering seeking legal remedies against the dissolution of the House of Representatives (HoR) in a bid to re-establish themselves at the forefront of national politics. They argue that the caretaker government led by former Chief Justice Sushila Karki may not be able to conduct the March 5, 2026 election in a free and fair manner. Their concern is not unfounded, given the fragile law and order situation marked by ongoing street protests and political uncertainty. The present confusion stems from the Gen Z demonstrations that flared last month. Frustrated by corruption, poor governance, and political theatrics, youths poured into the streets calling for accountability, the arrest of then–Prime Minister KP Oli, and eventually the dissolution of the HoR. Their persistence ultimately forced Oli to resign, paving the way for an interim arrangement. The younger generation’s success in toppling the government in just two days of protest has sparked new public debate about the importance of youth in national politics and decision-making.
JC recommends 35 judges for district courts and six judges for...
In the aftermath of the Gen Z movement, however, the country has begun to polarize politically. The newly formed government has yet to assert its authority, and traditional parties remain in disarray. The Nepali Congress (NC) and the CPN-UML are weighing their chances of re-establishing political dominance. This, however, could fuel confrontation between the old guard and victorious Gen Z youths, trapping the nation in prolonged uncertainty. Many believe that instead of knocking on the court’s door, the two parties should focus on election preparations, as the ballot box—not the courts—is the ultimate test of legitimacy. Taking disputes to court risks delaying the election process and increasing public suspicion. While doubts remain about the efficiency and fairness of the current government, mainstream parties can contribute by collaborating with authorities to ensure free and fair elections.
The NC and the UML, both criticized for failing to pursue internal reforms, must now step up efforts to revitalize their parties by bringing in youth leadership to win the trust of young voters. Instead of clinging to aging leadership, they must promote a new generation of leaders capable of setting a fresh rhythm for a new Nepal. The Gen Z protesters have already shown that public patience with traditional parties and their leaders is running out. The upcoming election, if held on schedule, will test every party. It is fair to say that only those parties willing to change in line with the aspirations of young voters stand a chance in the March 5 polls. Rather than pursuing legal remedies against the House dissolution, Nepal’s political players must work hard to regain credibility. Courts can settle disputes, but only the people can confer legitimacy through the ballot box.
