header banner

Money and politics

alt=
By No Author
The nexus between money and politics is one of the enduring challenges facing modern democracies. The political parties, which are the main players in a democratic system, need money to mobilize their cadres and supporters and reach out to the public with their agenda. So the challenge is not so much how to end the role of money in politics as how to set a legitimate limit for its use and to ensure transparency.



All democracies—new and old—struggle to address this challenge but it is more pronounced in the case of fledgling democracies like our own. The public notice issued by the Election Commission against 41 political parties on Saturday, asking them why it should not revoke their registration for failing to submit their income-expenditure statements, is a grim reminder of the distance that we still need to cover before we are anywhere close to judiciously addressing this challenge.



As per existing election law, the parties are required to submit their audited financial reports to the Election Commission every year. And if a party fails to comply with this requirement for three consecutive years, the Commission can annul its registration. The major political parties—including the UCPN (M), NC and UML—rushed to submit their hurriedly prepared audit reports just a few days before the end of the three-year deadline.



This clearly shows that the parties see financial transparency as a burdensome legal obligation and not a moral obligation. None of Nepal’s parties has a clean financial track record and the larger the party the bigger the problem. Though the big three -- UCPN (M), NC, UML-- have submitted their audited reports, it is hard to believe that these reports encompass all their incomes and expenditures. When it comes to their finances, the parties hide more than they reveal. This opacity that pervades almost all the political parties in Nepal often serves the interests of the party establishments as it gives them a monopoly over the use and misuse of money.



Leave alone the EC or the general public, even senior party leaders are often in the dark about the financial status of their respective parties. As long as Girija Prasad Koirala was the NC president, party leaders and cadres hardly ever dared to ask him how much money the party had at any given point in time. Though rival factions among the Maoists raise the issue of financial transparency in the party, and even occasionally accuse Maoist Chairman Pushpa Kamal Dahal of corruption, they have hardly any idea how much money Dahal controls or how much their party raised during the insurgency. Forcing the parties to maintain transparency is key to strengthening intra-party democracy.



Related story

Money and life

Related Stories
ECONOMY

Agreement between City Express Money Transfer and...

download_20211209173825.png
OPINION

Politics and Business

politicsandbusiness_20210807110958.jpg
OPINION

Neither balancing nor bandwagoning

5_20200310091614.jpg
My City

Decoding Nepali Celebrities’ New-found love for...

Decoding Nepali Celebrities’ 
New-found love for politics
POLITICS

If money dominates politics, future of youth will...

Hridayesh Tripathi.jpg