header banner

Special session

alt=
By No Author
The Unified Communist Party of Nepal (Maoist), in collaboration with five fringe parties in parliament, has petitioned President Dr Ram Baran Yadav to summon a special session of parliament. Such a petition is the constitutional right of lawmakers since the interim constitution clearly says that one-fourth of the membership of parliament can seek a special session. But the pertinent question here is political, not constitutional: Does this help address the current political stalemate? The answer is clearly no. Why, then, have the Maoists rushed to register a petition that is only going to further polarize national politics? We hardly see any reason behind it other than that it will help divert public attention away from the internal divisions in the Maoist party that have been under media scrutiny for the last several weeks. And, of course, it will also help to rally a divided party behind the leadership once there are confrontations in parliament with other parties.



Far from resolving the political problem, the petition itself has now become a new problem. The President´s Office finds itself in a difficult position. Since the petition explicitly mentions that the prime ministerial candidacy of NC leader Ram Chandra Paudel is no longer valid in parliament, which is a contested issue, the President´s Office is concerned whether summoning parliament would somehow validate the petitioners´ claim.



The status of Paudel´s candidacy is not just controversial but it is a complicated one as well. Generally, any proposal tabled in parliament becomes dead once the session is over. But a prime ministerial candidacy is too serious a matter to be considered defunct once the government decides to prorogue the session. Otherwise, it would mean that a caretaker government can avert an election in parliament for an indefinite number of times if it so wishes, through the simple expedient of a prorogue.



If there is a positive side to the petition, it´s this: It should expedite inter-party consultations and talks that have remained frozen with the fall in Kathmandu´s temperature. The talks, stalled to allow the Maoists to participate in their party plenum four weeks ago, have not yet resumed. And therein lies the main problem. No political party´s unilateral move inside or outside parliament is going to resolve the current stalemate. Only joint effort and a collective decision of at least the major political parties can address the current deadlock.



There is now a two-week window of opportunity before the president does summon a special session. The parties should exploit this and immediately resume talks to reach a deal on the peace process, constitution-writing and power-sharing. To plunge into unnecessary posturing and grandstanding during a special session of parliament will only reinforce differences among the parties and further trivialize politics. That´s least expected during these trying times.



Related story

Stocks inch higher amidst subdued market activity

Related Stories
POLITICS

Awareness about special needs education low in Nep...

IMG_2121.jpg
SOCIETY

Oli to address special session of Province 3 Assem...

Oli to address special session of Province 3 Assembly on Tuesday
POLITICS

Top leaders, including PM, addresses federal parli...

Top leaders, including PM, addresses federal parliament
POLITICS

Winter session of Federal Parliament begins today

FederalParliamentSept12_20190914181147.jpg
POLITICS

NC objects to govt's decision to prorogue House se...

1653826712_nepali_congress-1200x560_20230205095953.jpg