How can we improve our export?

Published On: November 4, 2018 12:10 AM NPT By: Suman Kumar Regmi


Suman Kumar Regmi

Suman Kumar Regmi

The contributor for Republica.
news@myrepublica.com

It is difficult to find international market for Nepali products because of our small scale production, lower quality and higher price 

Nepali industries have been receiving protection for many years. The protection has resulted in our industries not willing to go beyond the home market. It is a great irony that Nepali industrialists and traders are still looking for the assured market. However, along with globalization, there has been a sea change in trading of our goods. Going global has now become an inseparable part for Nepali business. With  economic  reforms   from time to time, Nepali  business  and industrial sectors  have  suddenly  found  themselves  in a weak  position.

Nepal has narrow export basis. During 1990s, there was a sharp decline in the export of rice, raw jute, pulse, and other agro-based and forest based products. Our major exports are iron and steel products, carpet, readymade garments, jute goods, yarn, cardamom, tooth paste, rosin, catechu, toilet soap, lentil, handicrafts and pashmina. Carpet and garments experienced a harrowing fall after 2001.  

Fall of export 
With the phase out of MFA – American quota system in 2004, Nepal has been facing tough competition in the American garment market. The carpets also do not have the assured market. Imposition  of social  and environmental  clauses  in trade  regime  by Germany  and other  European  countries  largely affected the export of Nepali garments and handicrafts in the European market.   

Until the nineties, Nepal was successful in exporting vegetable ghee, lentils, pashmina, polyester yarn, carpet, garments, iron and steel products to India and Bangladesh. However, the performance of these exportable items was not significant. 

It has been experienced that even a minor problem in the export of the items would change the export scenario of Nepal. Such case can be taken in the case of carpet, pashmina, iron and steel products, and garments. Steel and iron have one of the top most export items for some years. 

It is difficult to find international market for Nepali products because of our small scale production, lower quality and higher price. Besides, India’s trade policy and practices have affected Nepal’s foreign trade. India imposes  multiplicity  of restrictions  on imports  from Nepal and  exercises  monopoly  by levying  extra freight  charges  and yellow some  custom transit  declaration procedures for  Nepali  exports  to third countries. 

Despite continued efforts, the gap between imports and exports is only widening. In many cases, Indian trade policy has influenced Nepal’s exports adversely. In order to  make  trade competitive, tariff  rates  have been  adjusted, export procedures  have been  simplified, quantitative  restrictions  and import  licensing  system  have been abolished and  bonded  warehouse  and duty  drawback  activities have been introduced to make  exports  more competitive. 

It is believed that the decline in tariff rates often leads to increase in the flow of trade, but    experiences  of the  ASEAN  countries show that  lowering  tariff  by itself  does  not  lead in trade expansion. The non-tariff barriers are also equally important. 

Non-tariff barriers matter 
In Nepal, trade documentation and transaction procedures are still considered a major hurdle to expedite export. Competitiveness in price or quality of commodities, but if these transaction procedures are burdensome, it can definitely affect the demand of our products in the international market.    

Transit has always been a big issue in Nepal. Our landlocked position makes us dependent on our neighbors for access to sea. Nepal has made transit agreements with India and Bangladesh to use their territories to sea.  However, Nepal hasn’t been able to utilize the transit points to the fullest extent. Except Kolkatta port, Nepal has not been used other ports owing to distance and other reasons. New hope of using Vishakhapatanam and Kerung route would be viable for Nepal. Besides, Vishakhapatnum can also be route to export goods.  

Pakistan facilitates warehousing provision at Karachi port for Nepali cargo for onward transportation to third countries. Bangladesh  has also  provided  transit  facility  to Nepal  for the third  country  trade via Khulna  and Chittagong  ports. Use of Fulbari route has not been easy access for Nepal. Because of passport and visa forwarding and logistic problems, these ports of Bangladesh have not been used as alternative transit points. These ports are also not economically cost effective. Hence, they are used only when there are problems at Kolkatta port.

The transport and transit costs are other factors that have largely eroded Nepal’s competitiveness in the international market. These costs are estimated to range between 15 and 20 percent of the commodity value. 

Dry port could be an option 
One of the ways to solve many of the transit issues is the operation of dry port inside the country. The process of development of inland container depot (ICD) together with Birgunj Dry Port in Birgunj has not been fully implemented. Nepali  private  sector feels  that  this container  depot  needs to be converted into a full fledged  dry port and such  depots  need to  be implemented  in other  parts of the country as well. 

Besides, Nepal should try to find alternative economy transit points. This may not be financially very viable in the short run but will help in the long run. The bulk of Nepal’s exports rely on the facilities and concession extended by friendly nations. So far, it has not been able to improve and develop its competitiveness. As a member of the World Trade Organization (WTO), Nepal has to improve its competitive strength. 

Many countries in the west are now imposing eco-labeling requirements on their imports. And Nepal’s exports trade  will have  to  meet  the standards  set  by  the  importing  countries. 

                                              

The author is former Deputy Executive Director of TEPC


Leave A Comment